Aaron's Homepage Forum
Aaron's Homepage Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Electronics
 Basic Electronics
 Ni Cad vs Ni MH

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File (GIF, JPG, JPEG, BMP, ZIP, PNG)
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
jast Posted - Sep 15 2008 : 01:33:35 AM
Other then the memory problem and the lower Mah what are the differences between them? I always thought that Ni Cads can put out a higher current for a longer time period due to the discharge curve but I'm not sure that is absolutely true.
2   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
audioguru Posted - Sep 15 2008 : 12:42:17 PM
Out-of-date information is deceiving.

Energizer have datasheets for their batteries on their website.
Their Ni-MH cells have a higher current rating and a much greater capacity than their Ni-Cads, so they don't make Ni-Cads anymore.

For many years, Sanyo made Ni-Cad batteries for models. I have a Sanyo Ni-MH battery for my electric model airplane and it works perfectly at very high currents.
pebe Posted - Sep 15 2008 : 02:16:37 AM
You will find this publication to be a mine of information.

http://www.batteryuniversity.com/parttwo-33.htm

Aaron's Homepage Forum © 1995-2020 AARONCAKE.NET Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.05 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000