| Federico Colombo |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Thursday, August 12, 2010 12:53:00 AM |
| I biuld this circuit but I receive no signal (yet)... I used a 2N5179 instead of 2N918. 1N34A instead of 1N82. And a C7 of 22uF (not 15uF). The other parts are same as needed. Do you have any comments about these replaces?.
Thank you very much. |
| anonymous |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:34:35 PM |
| I built it and works! I replaced 2n918 with a 9018 with a frequency transition of 1100 mhz! I made L2 with 28 turns of 0,6 mm wire on 7mm drill bit , 1.6 cm long. Also a diode 1n34 works fine! |
| Don Hill |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Saturday, October 17, 2009 12:48:32 PM |
| My research indicates that the 1N82 is a germanium diode from the fifties. A 1N34 should work as a replacement. A normal silicon diode will not work well as a Germanium diode has a 0.3V forward drop and a silicon diode has a 0.7V forward drop. |
| anonymous |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 5:40:37 AM |
| does it work? |
| 1s4 |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Friday, July 17, 2009 9:24:00 PM |
| for air band i am using a 3.5 turn coil of wire on a 3/8 in. coil form the wire is 22ga. |
| mohammed shafeeq.p |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 1:07:34 AM |
| its really fantastic opertunity to see this circuit & to create it |
| Meysam |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Friday, July 03, 2009 12:09:33 PM |
| How can we change the range of this radio to 118~137MHz? |
| Dark Fox |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Wednesday, June 24, 2009 5:00:27 PM |
| Can I replace diode 1N82 for 1N60? If no, what diode can I replace 1N82? |
| 1s4 |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Friday, June 19, 2009 2:22:09 PM |
| you can obtain a 2N918 transistior from mouser electronics web site a MPS2222A transistor will only work on air band 117-137 mhz not 220-400mhz. |
| wparker1934 |
Aircraft Radio Communications Receiver |
Monday, May 04, 2009 9:52:23 PM |
| A more common subsistute for 2N918 would be nice. |